'Witness: Essay\r'

'Persuasive Essay †Witness Our crystalize individual identities argon shaped by our interpretations of our ordering’s ideals and values. As individuals, we reflect in our personalities and actions by what we hear and see in the media, and through and through what we brook sight personally in the world in general. Having an experience of our society’s rules, we argon stand forted to make informed decisions and choices by the ethical and honorable concerns that we are bound by. Despite this, when moving from mavin coun look for to another, we may be confronted by a divers(prenominal) system with distinct and perhaps seemingly unusual sets of principles.\r\nIf this is indeed the case, this would be reflected by the different batch in the country as a whole compared to our own. In order for unity and accord to flourish between these two countries, establishing common funda handst is requirement, or if this is not possible than an acknowledgement of sev eral(prenominal) of their ideals and values and the abandonment of some of ours is necessary. However, in doing this we are losing our original personal identity. In the film, â€Å"Witness,” directed by shaft of light Weir, an Amish widow, Rachel Lapp, and her young son, Samuel, depart for Baltimore to visit their relative.\r\nThey take a break in a rail government agency rank in Philadelphia and Samuel, in his emergency to explore and encounter the modern world he is surrounded by, begins question al star in his need to belong. In the men’s toilets, he is a witness to a murder and is traumatized by it. Evidently, it changes him and his views of the world are invariably altered. When he is confronted by another Amish named Eli, he is asked a series of questions leading up to as to whether he would ever kill a man. Samuel replies to this question by stating, â€Å"… nly the bad men”. clear, this emphasizes the change seen in Samuel through his int eractions with others outside the Amish union. This proves that in general, the need to belong and the people we are influenced and surrounded by can ease up some significant impacts affecting who we be fuck off. Similarly, the need to intermingle in and belong can change the reputation of an individual for the better. This is particularly seen in Witness when a cop named privy Book is forced to run his home when faced with danger.\r\nHe breaks his ties and lives with the Amish in lair to protect himself as well as Samuel, a key witness to a murder, along with his mother. During the flowing that hind end spends with the Amish he begins to recognize their way of smell and grows an appreciation for it. This is indicated when he starts to dress like the Amish. When he does this for the first time, he asks Rachel whether he find outs Amish. Rachel replies by commenting, â€Å"You look plain. ” Further prove of his acceptance, is when John takes up woodworking and helps with the barn raising.\r\nThrough these actions, later he is ultimately accepted by Eli; this is supported when he warns John when three dangerous looking men come to see him. John’s visit to the Amish community changes him. Some may argue that it is not the multitude we belong to that defines who we are. In fact, they may try to tranquillise us that it is only our individual actions that instigate who we become. This may be particularly true in matters where the need for someone to belong to is denied by their biological family. However, it cannot be taken as a rule in general and is rarely the case.\r\nAs put advancing by Maslow’s hierarchy of inescapably, our search for a group to interact and be part of is essential before feelings of self-esteem and self-actualization can be met. For our take to be met we would not try to establish relationships with those who we set out nothing in common or loathe. We are more in all probability to form bonds to those who resemble us most and share common interests with. It is only when these ties are broken that we feel more susceptible of either danger looming our way and immediately we form new relations with a more different group.\r\nTo hold out in, this may require the adjustments of our own personality since any group has their own special and unique identity to begin with. In the case of both Samuel and John a change was observed in their identities as they migrated from one area to another to suit the needs of their particular environments. This change would have enabled them to more likely survive if they were to permanently live in much(prenominal) bottoms. The clashing of ideals and values held by the Amish were not just intertwined with the principles of city living.\r\nFor this reason a change was observed in the behaviours of both Samuel and John. However, one might ask, what would be the case for the exceptions? What about for the people who take no recognition in their own rule s and despite everything try to break every single one of them? Would they fit snugly well in place with a completely different set of ideals and values? In this society would they be seen as the respective citizens? Who knows? Clearly it is hard to imagine such a place so different to our own but one thing is certain, a society’s way of living is what defines every individual who is part of it.\r\n'