'Taiwan Living Culture\r'

' in that location is an issue comes up when chinaw atomic number 18 talks ab come out of the closet culture conservation, which is the conflict betwixt social reading and deliverance of forces dependents’ colonisations. chinaware is a place that lived by Holo, Hakka and indigenous peoples. overly indigenous people, there are many main republicers who came from mainland chinaware. Those mainlanders came with Kuomintang government for political affairs that happened in China since 1940s. Hence, correspond to indigenous people, phalanx dependents’ villages, the places mainlanders were backup, is actu tout ensembley a diminished culture in chinaware.thitherfore, there are or so problematicalies for the culture-based shop classs when they are move to protect military dependents’ villages. There is lesser population who insist to protect their culture. Moreover, a number of resident physicians were basically moved out from the villages. In this iss ue, we could study the issue with our pagan converse knowledge, oddly identify the culture element that the issue brought by. relate to the article title, preserving military dependents’ villages, the article is discussing about how the workshops trying to preserve military dependents’ villages and what are the concerns they are having.Since military dependents’ villages are minor(ip)ity culture in chinaware, as well as they are non mainland China’s local culture, we mint understand how difficult the workshops’ tasks are. Hence, preserving military dependents’ villages is an issue. This issue was discussed recently. It was being studied since 1990s. We sight that it was a trend of cultural discussion, which has no inference beginning and ending. It is generally happened in Taiwan. Those active workshops were direct much in Kaohsiung and new-fashioned capital of Taiwan urban center. There are around people who involved in this issue.First of all, there is a workshop called Association of Mainlander Formosan (AMT). It is formed in 2004. Yang Tsung-rong is maven of board of directors of AMT. He is an Associate Professor at National Taiwan Normal University in Taipei too. He give tongue to that the workshop recently focuses on conserving the unique villages. The certify involved party is Ministry of National Defense (MND). The land of dependents’ villages belongs to MND. There is a law named Act for reconstruct Old Quarters. It assures MND to have right of demolish the village after the military dependents moved out.They allow rebuild new apartments for military dependents. Sometimes, they s experient the apartments in union with National Property Act to fund the turn of apartments. The third party is Lin Fung-ching, who is a deputy unwritten sex executive of Kaohsiung Military Dependents’ Villages Culture Development Association. The workshop was formed in 2007 and operates the Kaohs iung Museum of Military Dependents’ Villages. She agreed that less-is-more system which means preserving a limited number of the lodgment areas is sufficient.She understood the government’s concern since preserving all 888 villages is a challenge of local development. Nevertheless, she stated that preserving old buildings in a village is not enough. The stern psyche is Wang He-ping, who is anformer(a) chief executive of the Kaohsiung workshop. He supports the preservation idea and aims to preserve Mingde New Village, Zuoying dominion as a â€Å" reinforcement museum” that would see villagers put out to live in the village. Visitors can move into unoccupied houses to feel their day life culture. He compound that preserving the villages is promoting â€Å"green belt” concept.It would add to Kaohsiung’s touristry resources. He said that dependents’ villages are a minority culture, but they are not a minor part of Taiwan’s cultur e. Wang Ji-xin is the fifth person who involved in this issue. He is a entry board member of the New Taipei City Military Dependents’ Villages Culture Association which formed by year 2007. The association is to preserve approximately 60 houses of Sanchong First Village. He is a former resident of the village too. He mentioned that bulldozers will also withdraw an irretrievable piece of Taiwan’s pluralistic culture.Sanchong First Village’s residents had move out and into purpose- built apartment buildings in New Taipei City by 2006. They could only make oral histories instead of make a living museum as Mingde does. Basically, Taiwan is a place that highly appreciates traditional culture. At first, they believed and followed the Chinese culture. Since 1990s, Taiwan started to focus on local culture. They appreciate Holo, Hakka and indigenous assemblys. Even Ministry of upbringing introduced the program called â€Å"Knowing Taiwan” which focused Taiwanà ¢â‚¬â„¢s history, geography and society instead of concern on mainland China.As the article mentioned, mainlanders who came to Taiwan with Kuomintang government had been allocated in certain places. They thought that staying in Taiwan was fleeting plan. However, the dream of â€Å"retaking mainland” faded and the mainlanders had to stay in Taiwan. According to government’s arrangement in 1980s, 90% of 110,000 households recorded in 1984, the dependents of mainlanders, who were military’s families, have left the villages. Nevertheless, some workshops tried to require to preserve the villages for culture conservation.At last, we found that the workshops perform so well which fight for their culture yet do not ignore the social development. What we learnt in communication and culture, we have no problem to agree that living lifestyle is one of culture definition’s elements. There is a set of pattern keep and shared human activities among a social group f rom generations to generations. In this article, the dependents’ villages are recognized culture of what we learnt in class. The military dependents’ villages were brought by mainlanders from mainland of China.They brought their families to Taiwan as well. Hence, they started bore their normal life in Taiwan generations by generations. Moreover, there are pictures of their culture proof. For the first foliate, we can see a big house built at Mingde New Village in Kaohsiung. It is for ranking(prenominal) officers. The second foliate has 5 motion-picture shows. The top one is the narrow alleys in the military dependents’ village. The photo beneath it shows the mandarin words which means â€Å"Be comfort amid confusion”. It would be probably the residents’ value oriented.The other two photos that wrote mandarin words, â€Å"One year to view ready, two years to recapture, three years to blank up and five years to finish the put-on”. The military has the purpose on recapture the mainland of China when they came to Taiwan. On the following page, there is a photo of some apartments. They are the new apartment buildings for military families such as these in Kaohsiung’s Zuoying District. We detect that the villages’ culture had been gone. The other photo in this page shows the military dependents villages’ cultural festival in New Taipei City.The fifth page showed the military uniforms and personal identity cards at the Kaohsiung Museum of military dependents’ villages. The last page showed the selection of dishes at a Kaohsiung military dependents villages’ food for thought festival in 2011 and a well-preserved living room at Sanchong First Village in New Taipei City. All of them are evidentiary culture. This issue is quite similar to Malaysia’s not to demolish Jalan Sultan case. We noticed that culture preservation is important, especially the historical buildings. We un derstand social development is important too yet there are some ways to avoid from demolishing cultural buildings.As the photo we saw in fourth page, the master copy outlook and environment was gone after the rebuilding. It will be happened in Jalan Sultan if we do not fight for the preservation of culture. It is sad if we lost our probative culture on our land. Therefore, we should appreciate our culture and approximate the other ways to avoid from demolishing our significant culture. For example, Melaka had preserved those culture buildings and items. They then become elements of tourism and improving our national incomes. Hence, we should think twice before we made the cruel decision of demolishing some precious and valuable cultures.\r\n'